The mineralogram: the tool, the analysis, the test
Introduction
On this page you will find an overview of the mineralogram, the technologies used over time for its analysis, and the differences between traditional methods and the third generation of Daphne BioMetaTests.
Summary
- The origins of the mineralogram
- The limits of the old mineralogram
- The third generation of Daphne BioMetaTests
- Wellness protocol and purpose of the test
The origins of the mineralogram
The first mineralograms, already in use in America in the 1970s, used a mass spectrometry technology, a technique that was popular in the mineralogy of the time also for the analysis of lunar rocks and for the analysis of metals used in Shuttle hulls and military aircraft. It was later also used in medicine for the analysis of minerals from human hair or animal fur.
Hair, in fact, behaves like a kind of rock, layering within it all the toxins, minerals and metals that we expel during our lifetime. Thanks to a technology able to measure the coherence of metals in the hulls of a military aircraft, it is also possible to measure the stratification of minerals and metals in human hair.
Today there are still laboratories that analyse the stratification process through these old technologies, but for years now a third generation of BioTests has been developed, using different methods for the analysis of the mineralogram.
The limits of the old mineralogram
The old mineralogram indicates a quantity of metals and minerals contained in the hair, where the body is expelling these elements. However, one must infer how much of them is actually contained in the body, but no mineralogram states this exactly.
Understanding, through the old mineral analysis, which toxic metals should be eliminated (because they are too high in the body) and which human minerals should be supplemented (because they are too low), is not possible on the basis of hair analysis with the old technique, since the hair only reports information relating to the expulsion of metals. Therefore, knowing that I have arsenic in my hair in a quantity of 5 mg does not give me information regarding the concentration of arsenic inside the body; I might have another 20 mg, or none at all because I have already eliminated every trace from the body.
The third generation of Daphne BioMetaTests
The third generation of Daphne BioMetaTests, on the other hand, analyses human tissue by taking its biofrequency into consideration, a concept of recent use in functional medicine, which is at the basis of the new integrated techniques of naturopathy and holistic medicine.
Knowing whether a metal “resonates” at a certain percentage in the body gives us a greater indication of its presence or, in any case, of its damage within the organs, compared to knowing the concentration in which it is present in the hair.
To give a practical example, it is as if we wanted to determine how much waste a factory has inside it by analysing only the contents of the external bins at the end of the day. Surely we can get an idea, but if the bins are full, perhaps there is no more waste inside the factory.
So if the hair is rich in mercury, perhaps the body has already expelled all the mercury it had before; if cadmium is not present in the hair, this does not mean that cadmium is not present in the rest of the body. In short, the old mineralogram technology is very fascinating, but in the end it measures, in a scientifically impeccable way, a portion of tissue from which we can hardly deduce the true quantity of metals or minerals in our body.
Wellness protocol and purpose of the test
The new third-generation technology patented by Daphne laboratories, while measuring biofrequency rather than milligrams, would be closer to reality also for the development of a wellness protocol for the elimination of toxic metals and the correct supplementation of the necessary minerals.
Useful insights
To learn more, you can also consult the page dedicated to Thema 02 or visit the page Request the Test.
Request a consultation