Third-generation BioTests: the evolution of food intolerance tests
The first person to begin studies on the semiotics of food intolerance tests was Dr. Arthur Coca in 1956.
The first generation of food intolerance tests
The first generation of Food Intolerance Tests included all those systems based on listening to the pulse, measuring kinesiology muscle strength, reading the hand, the iris, the body, and other empirical methods with a very high error rate.
Even today, tests mainly based on manual, subjective or empirical assessments are defined as first-generation tests.
The second generation: bioelectronic machines and flat waves
Later, bioelectronic machines were introduced, such as Vega, EAV, MORA and other similar instruments.
This phase represented the second generation of food intolerance tests, a real revolution for that time.
These instruments, still widely used and widespread today, use the flat waves of electrical signals.
The issue of errors in second-generation systems
In practice, these are simple milliammeters, some of them very sensitive. Studies by ASL and AIAS demonstrated in 2008 that the second generation of food intolerance tests had an estimated error rate of 56%.
The transition to Palladium™ Technology
In 2004, the DAPHNE LAB laboratories patented an innovative and revolutionary system in the field of food intolerance analysis systems.
This led to the creation of Palladium™ Technology, a Metasubstance system that amplifies the wave across multiple dimensions and analyses several values of the food with precision beyond expectations.
The name Palladium™ refers to the new technology at the foundation of the Daphne Lab laboratory system: Palladium™ Technology with Stratified Metasubstance.
The third generation of food intolerance tests
With Palladium™ Technology, a new era of Food Intolerance Tests began: the third generation of food intolerance tests.
Today, studies conducted by the health authority ASL and the research body AIAS have established that the third generation of food intolerance analysis reaches 94% repeatability, compared with 44% repeatability for second-generation bioelectronic machines.
The 94% scientific repeatability and reliability, supported by ASL protocols, represents a very significant result. According to market research, with the third generation of tests, in 2009 Italian pharmacies and doctors began turning to the MX Test system, moving beyond the old bioelectronic machine.
A step forward in analysis technology
The third generation represents a step forward in the evolution of analysis technology and opens a new era of BioTests in the field of preventive and functional medicine.
To learn more about the method behind Daphne Lab tests, you can also visit the page dedicated to the BioMetaTest method.
BioMetaTest Daphne Lab
The advantage of the third generation of tests is that the Daphne food intolerance report can measure 600 foods, 6 biological indexes, personalized exercise tables, personal diet, integrated wellness protocol and much more in a single analysis.
In addition to food intolerance analyses, it is also possible to request a mineralogram, a dysbiosis test, sports tests and 18 different types of metabolic tests within the same request.
The third generation of analysis systems is profoundly changing what was previously known about analysis methods and systems for evaluating the subject and therapeutic treatments.
These tests are called BioMetaTest MX and are presented as some of the most advanced BioTests available on the market and among the most convenient in terms of performance.
For a complete overview of the available tests, you can visit the page dedicated to Daphne Lab BioMetaTests. To explore the topic further, you can also read the page on food intolerances.